Spooky behavior with anonymous functions
Mostra commenti meno recenti
I noticed some useful but freaky behavior with anonymous functions and would like to understand the low-level details a bit better so I use this functionality without constant paranoia that it will blow up in my face. The behavior is easier to explain by example:
F = @(x)x+1;
for k = 1:5,F = @(x)F(x)+1;end
F(1)
% ans = 7
So it looks like MATLAB is retaining the definition of each instance of F *somewhere*. I can even save F as a mat file, and, upon reloading, F will retain this definition. Is there any way to peek into this "somewhere"? One use case is where I have a class with function handles as properties, and I want to composite those functions via overloaded arithmetic operations:
myObj1.F = @(x)x+1;
myObj2.F = @(x)x-1;
myObj3 = myObj1+myObj2; %where myObj3.F = @(x)x+1-1 or something like that
but myObj3.F will actually be something like @(x)myObj1.F(x)+myObj2.F(x)... so what happens if I clear myObj1 and/or myObj2? If someone else is examining myObj3, how could they tell what F is?
tl;dr: When nesting anonymous functions, if the variable instantiated with the anonymous function is overwritten or "cleared," the definition still seems to exist somewhere. How can a user view it?
Risposta accettata
Più risposte (0)
Categorie
Scopri di più su Loops and Conditional Statements in Centro assistenza e File Exchange
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!