Beginner's roblems with arrays

14 visualizzazioni (ultimi 30 giorni)
Morten Jensen
Morten Jensen il 23 Giu 2011
Hi!
I asked a question here a few days ago and was a bit too hasty in accepting the answer since it only solved a part of my problem.
Basically, I need to combine some values from different arrays:
K = 130;
V = [0.9 0 .5];
THETA = [pi/4 0 3*pi/4];
T = [0 33 57];
So that I have a Vnew and THETAnew that are 1xK and whose values change at T(1:end). So far I've managed to do it crudely like this:
timestep= ones(3,K);
timestep(1,:) = 0:K-1;
timestep(2,1:T(1,2) = V(1,1);
timestep(2,T(1,2)+1:T(1,3) = V(1,2);
timestep(2,T(1,3)+1:end = V(1,3);
timestep(3,1:T(1,2) = THETA(1,1);
timestep(3,T(1,2)+1:T(1,3) = V(1,2);
timestep(3,T(1,3)+1:end = THETA(1,3);
It works, however I'd like to make the code more neat and able to to handle any lengths of V, THETA and T (length(V) = length(THETA) = length(T) will always be true). For this, I've tried the following:
timestep = zeros(3,K);
timestep(1,:) = 0:K-1;
for l = 1:size(T,2)
timestep(2,T(1,l)+1:end) = V(l);
timestep(3,T(1,l)+1:end) = THETA(l);
end
But I cannot get this piece of code to work. MATLAB simply returns an error message when I try to run it.
Any help would be very appreciated.

Risposte (2)

Sean de Wolski
Sean de Wolski il 23 Giu 2011
I'm not getting any errors after I add a few parenthesis:
K = 130;
V = [0.9 0 .5];
THETA = [pi/4 0 3*pi/4];
T = [0 33 57];
timestep= ones(3,K);
timestep(1,:) = 0:K-1;
timestep(2,1:T(1,2)) = V(1,1);
timestep(2,T(1,2)+1:T(1,3)) = V(1,2);
timestep(2,T(1,3)+1:end) = V(1,3);
timestep(3,1:T(1,2)) = THETA(1,1);
timestep(3,T(1,2)+1:T(1,3)) = V(1,2);
timestep(3,T(1,3)+1:end) = THETA(1,3);
timestep2 = zeros(3,K);
timestep2(1,:) = 0:K-1;
for l = 1:size(T,2)
timestep2(2,T(1,l)+1:end) = V(l);
timestep2(3,T(1,l)+1:end) = THETA(l);
end
%%Check
isequal(timestep,timestep2)
%ans = 1
  7 Commenti
Morten Jensen
Morten Jensen il 23 Giu 2011
It was my mistake..
It is supposed to be like this:
K = 130;
V = [0.9 0 .5];
THETA = [pi/4 0 3*pi/4];
T = [0 33 57];
timestep= ones(3,K);
timestep(1,:) = 0:K-1;
timestep(2,1:T(1,2)) = V(1,1);
timestep(2,T(1,2)+1:T(1,3)) = V(1,2);
timestep(2,T(1,3)+1:end) = V(1,3);
timestep(3,1:T(1,2)) = THETA(1,1);
timestep(3,T(1,2)+1:T(1,3)) = THETA(1,2);
timestep(3,T(1,3)+1:end) = THETA(1,3);
timestep2 = zeros(3,K);
timestep2(1,:) = 0:K-1;
for l = 1:size(T,2)
timestep2(2,T(1,l)+1:end) = V(l);
timestep2(3,T(1,l)+1:end) = THETA(l);
Matt Fig
Matt Fig il 23 Giu 2011
See my comments below about the inefficient rewriting going on in this solution.

Accedi per commentare.


Matt Fig
Matt Fig il 23 Giu 2011
I cannot see a clear pattern since you are setting
timestep(3,T(1,2)+1:T(1,3)) = V(1,2);
Now if it was THETA(2), that we could work with. Will there always be three rows?
%
%
%
%
EDIT With clarifications in comments...
Here is a way to do it without re-writing parts of the vector over and over. This re-writing could be very inefficient for large arrays. This does assume T(1) is 0.
timestep2 = ones(3,K);
timestep2(1,:) = 0:K-1;
for ii = 1:length(V)-1
timestep2(2,T(ii)+1:T(ii+1)) = V(ii);
timestep2(3,T(ii)+1:T(ii+1)) = THETA(ii);
end
timestep2(2,T(ii+1)+1:K) = V(ii+1);
timestep2(3,T(ii+1)+1:K) = THETA(ii+1);
%
%
%
%
%
EDIT To illustrate the inefficiency discussed above:
K = 130000;
V = rand(1,5000);
THETA = rand(1,5000);
T = [0 sort(round(rand(1,4999)*13000))];
tic
timestep3 = zeros(3,K);
timestep3(1,:) = 0:K-1;
for l = 1:size(T,2)
timestep3(2,T(1,l)+1:end) = V(l);
timestep3(3,T(1,l)+1:end) = THETA(l);
end
toc
tic
timestep2 = ones(3,K);
timestep2(1,:) = 0:K-1;
for ii = 1:length(V)-1
timestep2(2,T(ii)+1:T(ii+1)) = V(ii);
timestep2(3,T(ii)+1:T(ii+1)) = THETA(ii);
end
timestep2(2,T(ii+1)+1:K) = V(ii+1);
timestep2(3,T(ii+1)+1:K) = THETA(ii+1);
toc
isequal(timestep2,timestep3)
%
%
%
I get:
Elapsed time is 4.148093 seconds. % re-writing
Elapsed time is 0.014087 seconds. % not re-writing
  2 Commenti
Morten Jensen
Morten Jensen il 23 Giu 2011
Yes, a mistake from my side. and yes, there will always be 3 rows. only length can change.
Matt Fig
Matt Fig il 23 Giu 2011
Ah, I see... Now it makes sense. Please be careful when posting questions in the future. Besides this mistake, you missed a bunch of parenthesis as well...

Accedi per commentare.

Categorie

Scopri di più su Loops and Conditional Statements in Help Center e File Exchange

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by