convfft vs. fftfilt (1D convolution)
8 visualizzazioni (ultimi 30 giorni)
Mostra commenti meno recenti
I'd like to use the fastest way for 1D convolution in Matlab. Under the discussions for convfft, it's said that fftfilt is faster than convfft, however i'm using the following equivalent commands (for large vectors), and i found fftconv to be faster. Any suggestions?
res1 = convfft(a,b);
res2 = fftfilt([a,zeros(length(b)-1,1)],[b,zeros(length(a)-1,1)]);
0 Commenti
Risposta accettata
David Young
il 15 Ago 2011
The relative speed depends on the the sizes of the vectors. The best way to find out which is fastest is to experiment - and that's therefore my suggestion.
There's some discussion of the 2-D case here and some experimental results, which show some of the factors you need to take into account.
Più risposte (0)
Vedere anche
Prodotti
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!