Create a Rayleigh distribution fitting experimental data

53 views (last 30 days)
Hi, i'm trying to fit a rayleigh distribution to experimental data, but even if I've found the optimal parameter B for the distribution, it results in a completely different one.
I've tried using histfit (which works but I can't use in my assignment), makedist and the distributionFitter app.
Here's the code i'm using:
B=raylfit(peaks); %find parameter for Rayleigh distribution
peaksdist=histcounts(peaks,1000,'Normalization','pdf'); %experimental distribution
hold on
When using the distributionFitter app I get this result instead:
But the parameter B used is the same in both (0.031).
How can I obtain the same distribution using the makedist function?

Accepted Answer

William Rose
William Rose on 17 Jan 2022
I plotted your data.
data=load(name);; %extract array 'data' from the structure 'data'
figure; subplot(311), plot(1:N,Data); xlabel('Sample'); title(name);
subplot(312), plot(1:5000,Data(1:5000)); xlabel('Sample');
subplot(313), plot(1:500,Data(1:500)); xlabel('Sample');
Now I understand why you want to model the distribution of peak heights. The data is a recording which shows bursts of activity. It is approximately symmetric about zero, like an electromyogram. Perhaps the peak height distribution will be useful for comparing recordings from different experiments.
Therefere let us find all the positive and negative peaks (i.e. peaks of -Data). Let us plot their histograms separately.
%find positive and negative peaks
fprintf('Found %d positive peaks and %d negative peaks. \n',length(peakpos),length(peakneg));
Found 3383 positive peaks and 3335 negative peaks.
%plot superimposed histograms of the positive and negative peak heights
h1p=histogram(peakpos,'FaceColor','g'); hold on
legend('Positive peaks','Negative Peaks'); title('Histogram');
Since the histograms are very similar, we combine the sets into a single set of peak heights, :
%The histograms show that the positive and negative peaks appear to have
%the same distribution, so we combine them into a single set.
peaks=[peakpos;peakneg]; Npk=length(peaks);
Now fit the peak heights with a Rayleigh distribution.
bhat=raylfit(peaks); %sqrt of max.likelihood estimate of b^2
fprintf('Best fit Rayleigh parameter: bhat=%.4f.\n',bhat);
Best fit Rayleigh parameter: bhat=0.0310.
Plot the histogram of peak heights and the corresponding values expected from the best fit.
numExp=Npk*h2.BinWidth*raylpdf(BinCenters,bhat); %expected number at each bin
hold on; grid on
ylabel('Number of Occurences');
titlestr=sprintf('$Histogram, N=%d, \\hat{b}=%.4f$',N,bhat);
plot(BinCenters,numExp,'-r.'); hold off
Interesting. The peak height distribution is clearly not from a Rayleigh distribution.
The theoretical ratio of mean to standard deviation, for a random variable with a Rayleigh distribution, is
The ratio is 1.109 for peaks, which is not close to the theoretical value, if peaks has a Rayleigh distribution. This is more evidence for the non-Rayleighness of peaks.
DANIELE PASINI on 17 Jan 2022
I'm not completely sure how or why this works, but it does, thank you very much!
I know that the two distributions don't work for my data, but that's what I need to do, try to fit both and comment on them.
If I can ask, could you explain why you used
to get the distribution and why my previous code didn't work (the one using makedist('Rayleigh','B',B); raydist=pdf(ray,peaks);)?
But either way thank you very much!

Sign in to comment.

More Answers (4)

the cyclist
the cyclist on 16 Jan 2022
According to the documentation for raylfit, it takes the raw data as input. Is there a reason you are not simply using
to find the fit parameter?
DANIELE PASINI on 16 Jan 2022
I need to make an analysis of the experimental distribution of the peaks value. Since later on I will need to also fit a Weibull distribution I've used findpeaks to find the peaks that are positive only and also eliminate very small values (maybe I'm wrong, but I will see further on the project). So I intended to eliminate those values. What I'm asking is basically why the two graphs I've posted are different even though I'm using the same parameter for the distribution? The same happens when I tried with the Weibull distribution.

Sign in to comment.

William Rose
William Rose on 16 Jan 2022
Edited: William Rose on 16 Jan 2022
@DANIELE PASINI, here is code with simulated data to demonstrate. As others have said, your data may not be appropriate for Rayleigh (whih is square root of the sum of two independent normal random variables). Your samples should be in vector x. Compute N=number of data points before computing numExp.
I did not use histfit, since you said it was not allowed. I did use raylfit(). If raylfit() is not allowed, then compute the maximum likelihood estimate for b^2, and take the square root:
bsqdhat=dot(x,x)/(2*N); . %MLE for b^2
The square toot of bsqdhat is not necessarily a MLE for b, and it may not be unbiased, but this seems to be what raylfit() does, because the result is the same to 4 decimal places, whenever I compare the estimates.
%WCR 20220116
%Generate simulated data to fit.
%Replace this section with your data.
N=1000; %number of samples
x=b*sqrt(-2*log(rand(1,N))); %x=vector of samples whose distribution we wish to esitmate
%fit the data
bhat=raylfit(x); %Matlab's fit
bsqdhat=dot(x,x)/(2*N); %MLE for b^2:
fprintf('Best fit Rayleigh parameter: bhat=%.4f, sqrt(b^2hat)=%.4f\n',bhat,sqrt(bsqdhat));
Best fit Rayleigh parameter: bhat=0.0308, sqrt(b^2hat)=0.0308
%plot the histogram of the data, and the number expected from the fit
numExp=N*h.BinWidth*raylpdf(BinCenters,b); %expected number at each bin
hold on; grid on
ylabel('Number of Occurences');
titlestr=sprintf('$Histogram, N=%d, \\hat{b}=%.4f$',N,bhat);
Good luck!

William Rose
William Rose on 18 Jan 2022
Edited: William Rose on 18 Jan 2022
[I edited this comment to correct typographical errors.]
histogram(peaks) plots the number of occurences of values within the range of x-values for that bin. The expected number of counts for that bin is the integral of the probability density function over the bin, times the total number of samples.
Since each bin is reasonably narrow, we can approximate the integral with the midpoint value times the width:
where p(x)=probability density at x, and , and = bin width. Therefore
The command
does not give the correct result because it does not multiply by the number of samples, and does not multiply by the bin width, and because the argument peaks is not the correct argument to use. Instead of peaks, you should pass the x-values at which you want to evaluate the probability density function. And those desired x values are the bin center points. You can see and understand from my code how I computed the bin center points.
I hope your work goes well. What is the source of your signal? Seismogram? Biological recording?
  1 Comment
DANIELE PASINI on 18 Jan 2022
Thank you very much, now it is much clearer!
It's a signal of accelerometers put on a bridge

Sign in to comment.

William Rose
William Rose on 18 Jan 2022
@DANIELE PASINI, very interesting. The autocorrelation shows some ringing at a period of about 16 samples, i.e. some kind of resonance at that frequency.

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by