Azzera filtri
Azzera filtri

calculate coefficients with linear regression

9 visualizzazioni (ultimi 30 giorni)
i have a set of data (xj, yj) which describe a function f(x) = a0 + a1x +a2 x^2 +a3 e^x
how can i find the coefficents a0, a1,a2,a3 modeling with linear regression and using quatratic programming.
so far i have found the slope and intercept.
my code is:
clc
clear
load('DataEx3(1).mat');
% calculating the mean for the x and y variable
x_mean = mean(xj);
y_mean = mean(yj);
% number of data points
n = length(xj);
%cross deviation of x and y
dev_xy = sum(xj*yj.') - (n*x_mean*y_mean);
%square deviation of x
dev_x = sum(xj*xj.') - (n*x_mean*x_mean);
% calculation of optimum coefficient a
a = dev_xy/dev_x;
% calculation of optimum intercept (c)
c = y_mean - (a*x_mean);
disp('value of coffiecent m is: '); disp(a);
disp('value of optimum intercept is: '); disp(c);
% best line has the form y = mx+c

Risposta accettata

Torsten
Torsten il 12 Ott 2022
Modificato: Torsten il 12 Ott 2022
A = [ones(numel(xj),1),xj,xj.^2,exp(xj)];
b = yj;
sol = A\b;
a0 = sol(1)
a1 = sol(2)
a2 = sol(3)
a3 = sol(4)
where xj and yj are used as column vectors.
  2 Commenti
Antrea Plastira
Antrea Plastira il 12 Ott 2022
when i tried this way, it appears the following message:
Error using horzcat
Dimensions of arrays being concatenated are not consistent.
Error in assignment1 (line 31)
A = [ones(numel(xj),1),xj,xj.^2,exp(xj)];
i forgot to mention that the xj and yj data provided are [1x401] double
Torsten
Torsten il 12 Ott 2022
Modificato: Torsten il 12 Ott 2022
As I wrote, you have to turn xj and yj into column vectors.
Your xj and yj are row vectors.

Accedi per commentare.

Più risposte (1)

Image Analyst
Image Analyst il 12 Ott 2022
Why do you want to use linear regression for that very non-linear function? Why not use fitnlm to do a non-linear fit to your equation? Demos attached.
  2 Commenti
Torsten
Torsten il 12 Ott 2022
The function is linear in the parameters to be fitted. Thus a linear regression suffices.
Image Analyst
Image Analyst il 12 Ott 2022
@Torsten Oh (sound of hand slapping forehead) you're right.
However if the x in the exponential had a coefficient a4,
f(x) = a0 + a1 * x + a2 * x^2 + a3 * exp(a4 *x)
then we could use fitnlm. Not sure why that last x doesn't have a coefficient, which would allow for a "slope" or different steepnesses of the exponential term. I think that would give a more flexible model. You could always put in a4, and if it's 1, then it's 1, and a linear estimation is fine. But if a4 is not 1, it might be a better model by including a4.

Accedi per commentare.

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by