4th order Runge - Kutta vs. 4th order Predictor - Corrector
5 visualizzazioni (ultimi 30 giorni)
Mostra commenti meno recenti
Hello once again. As we can see, the error of the 4th order predictor - corrector (assuminig my code for this is correct) is greater than that of 4th order Runge - Kutta. Shouldn't be the other way around ?
%--- Exercise 1 - A
%--- Solving the diff. eqn. N'(t) = N(t) - c*N^2(t) with c = 0.5 using
%--- Euler's method, Runge - Kutta method, and predictor-corrector method, and comparing in graph.
%--- I have four initial values for N0.
clc, close all, format long
tmax = 10; % input('Enter tmax = ');
c = 0.5;
h = 0.1;
f = @(t,N) N - c*N.^2;
N0 = [0.1 0.5 1.0 2.0];
LN = length(N0);
%---------- Analytical Solution ----------
for i = 1:LN
syms n(t)
Df = diff(n) == n - c*n^2;
nAnalytical = dsolve(Df,n(0) == N0(i));
nfun = matlabFunction(nAnalytical, 'vars', t);
%-------------------------------------------
t = 0:h:tmax;
L = length(t)-1;
%---------- Simple Euler's method ----------
EulerN = zeros(1,L);
for j = 1:L
EulerN(1) = N0(i);
EulerN(1,j+1) = EulerN(j) + h*f(':',EulerN(j));
end
% ---------- Improved Euler's method ----------
ImpN = zeros(1,L);
for j = 1:L
ImpN(1) = N0(i);
ImpN(1,j+1) = ImpN(j) + 0.5*h*( f ( t(j), ImpN(j) ) + f ( t(j+1), ImpN(j) + h * f ( t(j), ImpN(j) ) ) );
end
%---------- Runge - Kutta method ----------
RKN = zeros(1,L);
for j = 1:L
RKN(1) = N0(i);
K1 = f(t(j),RKN(j));
K2 = f(t(j) + h*0.5, RKN(j) + h*K1*0.5);
K3 = f(t(j) + h*0.5, RKN(j) + h*K2*0.5);
K4 = f(t(j) + h, RKN(j) + h*K3);
RKN(j+1) = RKN(j) + h/6*(K1 + K4 + 2*K2 + 2*K3);
end
%---------- 4th order Predictor - Corrector ----------
PredN = zeros(1,L);
CorN = zeros(1,L);
for k = 1:L+1
if k <= 4
PredN(k) = RKN(k);
CorN(k) = RKN(k);
else
PredN(k) = PredN(k-1) + h/24*( 55*f(t(k-1),RKN(k-1)) - 59*f(t(k-2),RKN(k-2)) + 37*f(t(k-3),RKN(k-3)) - 9*f(t(k-4),RKN(k-4)));
CorN(k) = PredN(k-1) + h/24*(9*f(t(k),PredN(k)) + 19*f(t(k-1),RKN(k-1)) - 5*f(t(k-2),RKN(k-2)) + f(t(k-3),RKN(k-3)));
end
end
PC4 = CorN;
%---------------------------------------------------
%---------- Plotting -------------------------------
figure(i)
subplot(3,1,1)
fplot(nAnalytical,[0 tmax],'k')
title({'Solution of N'' = N - 0.5N^2',sprintf('for the initial condition N_0 = %.1f', N0(i))})
xlabel('t'), ylabel('N(t)'), hold on, grid on
plot(t,EulerN,t,ImpN,t,RKN,t,PC4)
legend({'Analytical solution','Simple Euler','Improved Euler','RK4','PC4'},'Location','Southeast'), grid on
N = nfun(t);
subplot(3,1,2)
plot(t,abs(N - EulerN),t,abs(N - ImpN),t,abs(N - RKN),t,abs(N - PC4))
title(sprintf('Error of each method for N_0 = %.1f',N0(i)))
xlabel('t'), ylabel('Error')
legend({'Simple Euler','Improved Euler','RK4','PC4'}), grid on, hold on
subplot(3,1,3)
plot(t,abs(N - RKN),t,abs(N - PC4))
title(sprintf('Error of RK4 and PC4 for N_0 = %.1f',N0(i)))
xlabel('t'), ylabel('Error')
legend({'RK4','PC4'}), grid on, hold on
%----------------------------------------------------------
end
0 Commenti
Risposta accettata
Torsten
il 2 Gen 2025
Modificato: Torsten
il 2 Gen 2025
%--- Exercise 1 - A
%--- Solving the diff. eqn. N'(t) = N(t) - c*N^2(t) with c = 0.5 using
%--- Euler's method, Runge - Kutta method, and predictor-corrector method, and comparing in graph.
%--- I have four initial values for N0.
clc, clear all, close all, format long
tmax = 10; %input('Enter tmax = ');
c = 0.5;
h = 0.1;
f = @(t,N) N - c*N.^2;
N0 = [0.1 0.5 1.0 2.0];
LN = length(N0);
%---------- Analytical Solution ----------
for i = 1:LN
syms n(t)
Df = diff(n) == n - c*n^2;
nAnalytical = dsolve(Df,n(0) == N0(i));
nfun = matlabFunction(nAnalytical, 'vars', t);
% %-------------------------------------------
t = 0:h:tmax;
L = length(t)-1;
%---------- Simple Euler's method ----------
EulerN = zeros(1,L);
for j = 1:L
EulerN(1) = N0(i);
EulerN(1,j+1) = EulerN(j) + h*f(':',EulerN(j));
end
% ---------- Improved Euler's method ----------
ImpN = zeros(1,L);
for j = 1:L
ImpN(1) = N0(i);
ImpN(1,j+1) = ImpN(j) + 0.5*h*( f ( t(j), ImpN(j) ) + f ( t(j+1), ImpN(j) + h * f ( t(j), ImpN(j) ) ) );
end
%---------- Runge - Kutta method ----------
RKN = zeros(1,L);
RKN(1) = N0(i);
for j = 1:L
K1 = f(t(j),RKN(j));
K2 = f(t(j) + h*0.5, RKN(j) + h*K1*0.5);
K3 = f(t(j) + h*0.5, RKN(j) + h*K2*0.5);
K4 = f(t(j) + h, RKN(j) + h*K3);
RKN(j+1) = RKN(j) + h/6*(K1 + K4 + 2*K2 + 2*K3);
end
%---------- 4th order Predictor - Corrector ----------
PC4 = zeros(1,L+1);
PC4(1:4) = RKN(1:4);
for j = 4:L
PC40 = PC4(j)+h*(55.0*f(t(j),PC4(j))-59.0*f(t(j-1),PC4(j-1))+37.0*f(t(j-2),PC4(j-2))-9.0*f(t(j-3),PC4(j-3)))/24.0;
% correct PC4(j+1)
PC4(j+1) = PC4(j)+h*(9.0*f(t(j+1),PC40)+19.0*f(t(j),PC4(j))-5.0*f(t(j-1),PC4(j-1))+f(t(j-2),PC4(j-2)))/24.0;
end
%---------- Plotting -------------------------------
figure(i)
subplot(3,1,1)
fplot(nAnalytical,[0 tmax],'k')
title({'Solution of N'' = N - 0.5N^2',sprintf('N_0 = %.1f', N0(i))})
xlabel('t'), ylabel('N(t)'), hold on, grid on
plot(t,EulerN,t,ImpN,t,RKN,t,PC4)
legend({'Analytical solution','Simple Euler','Improved Euler','RK4','PC4'},'Location','Southeast'), grid on
N = nfun(t);
subplot(3,1,2)
plot(t,abs(N - EulerN),t,abs(N - ImpN),t,abs(N - RKN),t,abs(N - PC4))
title(sprintf('Error of each method for N_0 = %.1f',N0(i)))
xlabel('t'), ylabel('Error')
legend({'Simple Euler','Improved Euler','RK4','PC4'}), grid on, hold on
subplot(3,1,3)
plot(t,abs(N - RKN),t,abs(N - PC4))
title(sprintf('Error of RK4 and PC4 for N_0 = %.1f',N0(i)))
xlabel('t'), ylabel('Error')
legend({'RK4','PC4'}), grid on, hold on
%----------------------------------------------------------
end
3 Commenti
Torsten
il 2 Gen 2025
So, PC4 it's still worst than RK4, but is this true in general ?
Not in all regions for t. And both have order 4 - so why do you think PC4 should be more precise than RK4 ?
Torsten
il 3 Gen 2025
In order to avoid unnecessary evaluations of the derivative function, I suggest using the following code for the predictor-corrector scheme:
%---------- 4th order Predictor - Corrector ----------
PC4 = zeros(1,L+1);
PC4(1:4) = RKN(1:4);
fm1 = f(t(3),PC4(3));
fm2 = f(t(2),PC4(2));
fm3 = f(t(1),PC4(1));
for j = 4:L
fm0 = f(t(j),PC4(j));
PC40 = PC4(j)+h*(55.0*fm0-59.0*fm1+37.0*fm2-9.0*fm3)/24.0;
% correct PC4(j+1)
fPC40 = f(t(j+1),PC40);
PC4(j+1) = PC4(j)+h*(9.0*fPC40+19.0*fm0-5.0*fm1+fm2)/24.0;
fm3 = fm2;
fm2 = fm1;
fm1 = fm0;
end
Più risposte (1)
Torsten
il 2 Gen 2025
For k>4, the variable RKN should no longer appear in the equations
PredN(k) = PredN(k-1) + h/24*( 55*f(t(k-1),RKN(k-1)) - 59*f(t(k-2),RKN(k-2)) + 37*f(t(k-3),RKN(k-3)) - 9*f(t(k-4),RKN(k-4)));
CorN(k) = PredN(k-1) + h/24*(9*f(t(k),PredN(k)) + 19*f(t(k-1),RKN(k-1)) - 5*f(t(k-2),RKN(k-2)) + f(t(k-3),RKN(k-3)));
2 Commenti
Vedere anche
Categorie
Scopri di più su Numerical Integration and Differential Equations in Help Center e File Exchange
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!











