How many consecutive ones?

Write a function ConsecutiveOnes to detect in a logical row array of any length the locations the length of the ones sequences. If there is a single one, the location of the one should be indicated with a length of one. For example, for the input array [0 0 1 1 0 0 1] the function ConsecutiveOnes produces the output [0 0 2 0 0 0 1]; for the input array [0,0,1,1,0,0,0,1,1,1] the function ConsecutiveOnes produces the output [0 0 2 0 0 0 0 3 0 0]
I am trying a recursion function, which should be sth like
for i = 1:a
function indicator = solve(inputArray1(i))
I know this expression is wrong, but I wonder how to display an idea like this.

2 Commenti

Jan
Jan il 9 Nov 2017
Modificato: Jan il 9 Nov 2017
I do not understand the intention of these 2 lines of code. A recursive function is possible, but much more complicated then needed.
You got this homework to learn how to solve such problems. Then it would not be useful, if the solution is posted in the forum. Try it with a loop.
Zhuoyi Chen
Zhuoyi Chen il 9 Nov 2017
Modificato: Zhuoyi Chen il 9 Nov 2017
Yeah, I know that, but I did try. Also, I am here to ask for a method, not an answer. For my first attempt, I tried the following code.
a = length(inputArray);
indicator = zeros(1,a)
for i = 1:(a-1)
if (inputArray(i) == 1)&(inputArray(i+1) ==1)
indicator(i) = indicator(i) + 1
n = i+1
while n<=a
if inputArray(n) == 0
break
end
indicator(i) = indicator(i) +1
n = n+1
end
inputArray((i+1):n) = 0;
end
end
It works for [0,0,1,1,0,0,0,1,1,1] actually, but it fails to [0, 1, 1, 0, 1].

Accedi per commentare.

 Risposta accettata

Andrei Bobrov
Andrei Bobrov il 9 Nov 2017
Modificato: Andrei Bobrov il 9 Nov 2017
out = double(diff([~A(1);A(:)]) == 1);
v = accumarray(cumsum(out).*A(:)+1,1);
out(out == 1) = v(2:end);
or
out = zeros(size(A));
ii = strfind([0,A(:)'],[0 1]);
out(ii) = strfind([A(:)',0],[1 0]) - ii + 1;

5 Commenti

Zhuoyi Chen
Zhuoyi Chen il 9 Nov 2017
Thanks for posting! I will try it!
Zhuoyi Chen
Zhuoyi Chen il 9 Nov 2017
Modificato: Zhuoyi Chen il 9 Nov 2017
Okey, that is a super clever way to solve it.... LOL THANK YOU SO MUCH!
Jan
Jan il 9 Nov 2017
Modificato: Jan il 9 Nov 2017
@Andrei: As usual I've measured the timings. The STRFIND method is the fastest: +1 for this solution.
It is 10% faster if the padded array is created once only. This matters especially for large inputs, which do not match into the processor cache:
out = zeros(size(a));
aa = [0,a,0];
ii = strfind(aa, [0 1]);
out(ii) = strfind(aa, [1 0]) - ii;
Thank you Jan!
Image Analyst
Image Analyst il 22 Feb 2019
Please start a new thread on this (not here).

Accedi per commentare.

Più risposte (2)

Jan
Jan il 9 Nov 2017
Modificato: Jan il 9 Nov 2017
I'd start at the end of the vector and store the value. Then run a loop from length(a)-1 to 1. If the corresponding element is 0, the value of c is written to the element on the right and c is set to 0. If it is 1, c is increased by 1. After the loop the last value of c is written to the first element of the output.
a = [0,0,1,1,0,0,0,1,1,1];
c = a(end);
for k = length(a)-1:-1:1
if a(k) == 0
a(k+1) = c;
c = 0;
else
a(k+1) = 0;
c = c + 1;
end
end
a(1) = c;
Or the same with multiplications instead of the IF branches:
a = [0,0,1,1,0,0,0,1,1,1];
c = a(end);
for k = length(a)-1:-1:1
a(k+1) = c * (1 - a(k));
c = a(k) * (c + 1);
end
a(1) = c;
Well, this is ugly. Without good comments, it will take a while until its intention gets clear.
In productive code a vectorized method would be the best idea:
k = find([true, diff(a) ~= 0]); % Indices of changed values
r = zeros(size(a));
r(k) = a(k) .* diff([k, length(a)+1]); % Distance of changes

6 Commenti

Zhuoyi Chen
Zhuoyi Chen il 9 Nov 2017
Thanks for posting!
Zhuoyi Chen
Zhuoyi Chen il 9 Nov 2017
Well... while running your first method. I got [0 0 2 0 0 0 0 3 0 1] instead of [0 0 2 0 0 0 0 3 0 0] in the case of [0,0,1,1,0,0,0,1,1,1]. I suggested that something might go wrong....
Jan
Jan il 9 Nov 2017
Modificato: Jan il 9 Nov 2017
Problem is fixed.
Jan
Jan il 9 Nov 2017
Modificato: Jan il 9 Nov 2017
As usual some timings:
function neatoTest
a = randi([0,1], 1, 1e6);
tic; for k = 1:20, r = Accum(a); end; toc
tic; for k = 1:20, r = Strfind1(a); end; toc
tic; for k = 1:20, r = Strfind2(a); end; toc
tic; for k = 1:20, r = Loop1(a); end; toc
tic; for k = 1:20, r = Loop2(a); end; toc
tic; for k = 1:20, r = Find1(a); end; toc
end
function out = Accum(a)
out = double(diff([~a(1);a(:)]) == 1);
v = accumarray(cumsum(out).*a(:)+1,1);
out(out == 1) = v(2:end);
end
function out = Strfind1(a)
out = zeros(size(a));
ii = strfind([0,a(:)'],[0 1]);
out(ii) = strfind([a(:)',0],[1 0]) - ii + 1;
end
function out = Strfind2(a)
out = zeros(size(a));
aa = [0,a,0];
ii = strfind(aa, [0 1]);
out(ii) = strfind(aa, [1 0]) - ii;
end
function a = Loop1(a)
c = a(end);
for k = length(a)-1:-1:1
if a(k) == 0
a(k+1) = c;
c = 0;
else
a(k+1) = 0;
c = c + 1;
end
end
a(1) = c;
end
function a = Loop2(a)
c = a(end);
for k = length(a)-1:-1:1
a(k+1) = c * (1 - a(k));
c = a(k) * (c + 1);
end
a(1) = c;
end
function r = Find1(a)
k = find([true, diff(a) ~= 0]); % Indices of changed values
r = zeros(size(a));
r(k) = a(k) .* diff([k, length(a)+1]); % Distance of changes
end
Results (R2009a, Win64):
Elapsed time is 0.873261 seconds. Andrei Accumarray
Elapsed time is 0.601190 seconds. Andrei strfind
Elapsed time is 0.532654 seconds. Andrei strfind + [0,a,0]
Elapsed time is 1.053366 seconds. Jan loop
Elapsed time is 0.956481 seconds. Jan ugly loop
Elapsed time is 0.709494 seconds. Jan vectorized
The best vectorized solution is two times faster than the loop. But loops are not as bad as the ancient rumors claim.
+1
Jan
Jan il 10 Nov 2017
@Zhuoyi Chen: Flags are thought to call admins or editors to care about contents, which conflict with the terms of use, e.g. if they are offending. You can use a comment to mention, that a solution is working.
@Andrei: Thanks. It is interesting, that your STRFIND solution gets faster, if the input contains less 1s, while the loops do not profit.
I think, although we have posted solutions of a homework, the overkill of 6 different methods has supported the OP to learn something new about Matlab. :-)

Accedi per commentare.

Image Analyst
Image Analyst il 10 Nov 2017
Interested in the method I first thought of?
v = [0,0,1,1,0,0,0,1,1,1]
v2 = zeros(size(v)); % Initialize vector of same length.
props = regionprops(logical(v), 'Area', 'PixelIdxList');
for k = 1 : length(props)
v2(props(k).PixelIdxList(1)) = props(k).Area;
end

2 Commenti

Andrei Bobrov
Andrei Bobrov il 10 Nov 2017
+1
bwconncomp may offer some speed improvements over regionprops. But I didn't know of either of these remarkable functions before seeing this, so thank you!

Accedi per commentare.

Categorie

Scopri di più su Loops and Conditional Statements in Centro assistenza e File Exchange

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by