How to write a composite contraint or comparator to be usable in unittest framework

1 view (last 30 days)
Jan Tusch
Jan Tusch on 11 Dec 2019
Edited: Lawrence on 17 Mar 2021
I'm struggeling with a supposedly simple task:
For a given example class
classdef SimpleClass
properties
some_string (1,1) string = "some_string"
some_vague_number (1,1) double = 0
some_precise_number (1,1) double = pi()
end
end
I want to write a constraint that checks "similarity" of two instances of the class. The strings should be equal and I want to parametrize the tolerances for each property separately. Clearly i could verify the conditions one after another but I would have to repeat that for each qualification, which is not good, when the class changes.
In short, I would like to have a class that combines a sequence of Comparators (pluggable into IsEqualTo(...'Using'...) ) or a constraint that uses the tolerances for checking and the diagnostic reporting thereof.
I have already made some attempts that don't work:
  • Derive a class SimpleClassComparator from IsEqualTo and pass an array of PublicPropertyComparator, each just looking at one field, to the base class constructor. But the the tests always pass.
  • Derive a class from contraint and implement the abstract methods as a sequence of my nested constraints for each field. That had some other problems and cannot be used for containers.
I can provide code for my approaches but firstly I would like to know:
What is the right way to implement a custom Comparator for the unittest framework?
  6 Comments
David Hruska
David Hruska on 18 Dec 2019
Hi Jan and others,
I was going to suggest writing a custom comparator subclass, but it seems you've already tried this and run into issues. Could you expand on what those issues were? Also, could you clarify how you'd like your constraint to work with containers? Are you saying that you'd like to compare two SimpleClass instances stored inside cell arrays, for instance?
As you've found, comparing values can be trickier than you might expect. For this reason, the Comparator interface isn't documented for extension (it may change in future releases as the framework evolves). We'd definitely want to address these challenges in writing a custom comparator before documenting the interface.

Sign in to comment.

Accepted Answer

Lawrence
Lawrence on 16 Mar 2021
Edited: Lawrence on 17 Mar 2021
A bit of a late reply, but here's a solution for anyone still needing one.
Probably implementing a custom constraint is simpler than implementing a custom comparator. You would follow the steps here: https://www.mathworks.com/help/matlab/matlab_prog/create-custom-constraint.html. I'm not sure what you mean by "That had some other problems and cannot be used for containers", but the code below works with the SimpleClass you provided.
In short, the constructor of the constraint would take an expected value and two additional tolerance inputs, all of which are stored to member variables. Then you would have a helper function to do the comparisons.
classdef similarTo < matlab.unittest.constraints.Constraint
properties (SetAccess = immutable)
expected
large_tolerance
small_tolerance
end
methods
function constraint = similarTo(expected,large_tolerance,small_tolerance)
constraint.expected = expected;
constraint.large_tolerance = large_tolerance;
constraint.small_tolerance = small_tolerance;
end
function bool = satisfiedBy(constraint,actual)
bool = constraint.customSimilarTo(actual);
end
function diag = getDiagnosticFor(constraint,actual)
import matlab.unittest.diagnostics.StringDiagnostic
if constraint.customSimilarTo(actual)
diag = StringDiagnostic('similarTo has passed.');
else
diag = StringDiagnostic(sprintf(['similarTo has failed.\n'...
'Actual string: %s, Expected string: %s\n'...
'Actual vagueNum: %d, Expected vagueNum: %d, Precision: %d\n'...
'Actual preciseNum: %d, Expected preciseNum: %d, Precision: %d'],...
actual.some_string, constraint.expected.some_string,...
actual.some_vague_number, constraint.expected.some_vague_number, constraint.large_tolerance...
actual.some_precise_number, constraint.expected.some_precise_number, constraint.small_tolerance));
end
end
end
methods (Access = private)
function bool = customSimilarTo(constraint, actual)
bool = strcmp(actual.some_string, expected.some_string)...
&& abs(actual.some_vague_number - constraint.expected.some_vague_number) < constraint.large_tolerance...
&& abs(actual.some_precise_number - constraint.expected.some_precise_number) < constraint.small_tolerance;
end
end
end
You then use this in your unit test:
verifyThat(testCase, actual, similarTo(expected, large_tolerance, small_tolerance))
Some customizations you could do would be baking the tolerances into the constraint class, either within similarTo or by sub-classing from it, and splitting the conditions in customSimilarTo into separate helper functions, so you can have a more granular diagnostic in getDiagnosticFor.
If by "cannot be used for containers" you are talking about arrays and cell arrays, you can combine the custom similarTo constraint with matlab's EveryElementOf and EveryCellOf without any additional modification.
  3 Comments
Jan Tusch
Jan Tusch on 17 Mar 2021
That looks like reasonable effort for adapting constraints for a class and keep tolerances configurable. Thanks alot for your code sample and the good explanation.

Sign in to comment.

More Answers (0)

Products


Release

R2019b

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by