Azzera filtri
Azzera filtri

Brute force combination of two vectors. Yet, the combination only gets written in a matrix if it fulfils two constraints.

2 visualizzazioni (ultimi 30 giorni)
I have two vectors:
and two values that are known:
These vectors are now of the same size, but this is not always the case. Thus, I would like to create a matrix (2 columns) that has every possible combination L_1,L_2 that fulfils the following constraints.
L_1< (a/theta_a); AND L_1< (b/theta_b);
The values theta_a and theta_b are calculated through on behalf of the values L_1 and L_2 with the following formula:
It would be great if the computational time can be reduced by an efficient script.
Thank you in advance.
  1 Commento
Ameer Hamza
Ameer Hamza il 9 Mar 2020
For the values of L_1 and L_2, a and b you gave, the function acosd can return complex value. The domain of acosd is -1 to 1 for real-valued output. But the input of acosd
can take any value beyong -1 to 1. How will you do comparison in that case.

Accedi per commentare.

Risposta accettata

Ameer Hamza
Ameer Hamza il 9 Mar 2020
Modificato: Ameer Hamza il 9 Mar 2020
combinations = combvec(L_1, L_2)';
Theta_a=acos((a^2+combinations(:,1).^2-combinations(:,2).^2) ...
Theta_b=acos((b^2+combinations(:,1).^2-combinations(:,2).^2) ...
mask = imag(Theta_a) == 0 & imag(Theta_b) == 0; % only keep rows where both angles are real
mask = mask & (combinations(:,1) < a./Theta_a) & (combinations(:,1) < b./Theta_b);
final_combinations = combinations(mask, :);
  2 Commenti
Abdelmajid Ben yahya
Abdelmajid Ben yahya il 9 Mar 2020
the first assumptions is not correct, as the formua is the derivation of the cosine rule.
These constraints are made to erase certain mechanical configurations, within a physical crank-shaft mechanism.
I attached some drawings to explainthe idea.
the first two drawings (top) show the mechanism, while the drawings underneath show the derivation of the constraints.
So, i think that the made assumptions can be rejected.
Ameer Hamza
Ameer Hamza il 9 Mar 2020
Ok, your formula is correct. I think it produces an imaginary number in some cases because it is impossible to create a real triangle for some combinations of L_1, L_2, a, and b. I corrected the code and added another condition that both angles should be real.

Accedi per commentare.

Più risposte (0)


Scopri di più su Environment and Clutter in Help Center e File Exchange




Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by