Pre-allocate memory to zeros or NaN?
42 visualizzazioni (ultimi 30 giorni)
Mostra commenti meno recenti
I'm dealing with large matrix size in a for loop and I currently pre-allocate the matrix to zeros before the for loop, however, this causes me some problems with some math equations I must apply on the matrix. So my question is, does pre-allocating the memory to a NaN matrix recommended? or does MATLAB not like that?
Update for clarification:
Example:
a=zeros(5,5)
for j=1:4:5
v=j;
a(:,j)=v+10;
end
So the problem is if I want to do any calculation with the rows, I will end up including rows 2,3,4 which are now 0, this messes up with my calculations. So I want to explore the option of creating a NaN matrix and using 'omitnan' in my calculations.
2 Commenti
KSSV
il 5 Ago 2021
It depends on what numbers you are going to fill into matrix. If you fill with zeros what problem it is causing? First what for the loop is?
Risposta accettata
Chunru
il 5 Ago 2021
Modificato: Chunru
il 5 Ago 2021
If you have skipped some data and want to omit those data later on, then the preallocation with nan is a better options. Especially if you want to use some matlab built in functions (such as mean, std), options are available to omit nans. NaN is the part of IEEE arithmetic representation, it should not have side effect on preallocatio. The only side-effect is when performing calculation (NaN+2=Nan), but you are prepared to ignore NaNs.
Più risposte (1)
Sulaymon Eshkabilov
il 5 Ago 2021
Of course, you can do memory allocation with nan() as well alike zeros(), e.g.:
k=10; m=15;
M = nan(k, m);
...
Vedere anche
Categorie
Scopri di più su Logical in Help Center e File Exchange
Prodotti
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!