Statistica
RANK
269.860
of 301.873
REPUTAZIONE
0
CONTRIBUTI
1 Domanda
1 Risposta
ACCETTAZIONE DELLE RISPOSTE
0.0%
VOTI RICEVUTI
0
RANK
of 177.094
CONTRIBUTI
0 Problemi
0 Soluzioni
PUNTEGGIO
0
NUMERO DI BADGE
0
CONTRIBUTI
0 Post
CONTRIBUTI
0 Pubblico Canali
VALUTAZIONE MEDIA
CONTRIBUTI
0 Punti principali
NUMERO MEDIO DI LIKE
Feeds
Risposto
why real part of fft (exp(at)) is negative in some parts in contrary to analytical calculation of fft(exp(at))?
Thanks for the reply. I agree with you that symmetry is important. But my problem is about the real values calculated from FFT. ...
why real part of fft (exp(at)) is negative in some parts in contrary to analytical calculation of fft(exp(at))?
Thanks for the reply. I agree with you that symmetry is important. But my problem is about the real values calculated from FFT. ...
circa 14 anni fa | 0
Domanda
why real part of fft (exp(at)) is negative in some parts in contrary to analytical calculation of fft(exp(at))?
Hi, I want to calculate the *real part* of fourier transform of A = exp(at) where "a" is a constant and t = [0 T]. when I calc...
circa 14 anni fa | 2 risposte | 0
