Force scientific notation in axes

Sometimes, when the "raw" values in the yticks are very small, matlab y axis automatically toggles to scientific notation, whereby the power of ten giving the order of magnitude appears in the top left corner, and the yticks are given in units of that power. The threshold for this behavior seems to be 1e-3, but I can't seem to find a property for forcing it on larger yticks.

I have found a few questions roughly on the same topic, but none of the relevant answers seem to apply to my case. Some people simply wanted to get rid of the scientific notation, other wanted it directly in the tick labels.

I like the "order of magnitude" format, but I am unable to force it (for instance, I'd like to have it for yticks of the order of 1e-2, for graphical homogeneity with a different plot).

Before downloading or creating an "ad hoc" code, I wanted to ask whether any of you knows a (perhaps undocumented?) way of toggling the "order of magnitude" notation.

Thanks a lot

Francesco

[pfb]

well, getting what I need does not require a lot of coding. For anyone interested, here is a quick example which does the trick when the focus is on the figure to be modified.

As soon as I have some time I'll turn it into a more complete function (unless something like this already exists).

% get ylim
yl=ylim;  

% get order of magnitude
e=log10(yl(2));
e=sign(e)*floor(abs(e));

% get and rescale yticks
yt=get(gca,'ytick')/10^e;

% create tick labels
ytl=cell(size(yt));
for j=1:length(yt)
    % the space after the percent gives the same size to positive and
    % negative numbers. The number of decimal digits can be changed.
    ytl{j}=sprintf('% 1.2f',yt(j));
end

% set tick labels
set(gca,'yticklabel',ytl);

% place order of magnitude
fs = get(gca,'fontsize');
set(gca,'units','normalized');
xl = xlim;
text(xl(1),yl(2),sprintf('x 10^%d',e),...
    'fontsize',fs,'VerticalAlignment','bottom');

[Daniel Thompson]

Exactly what I've just spent half an hour looking for - thanks so much for this!

One very small edit: change the penultimate line of code:

text(xl(1),yl(2),sprintf('x 10^%d',e),...

to

text(xl(1),yl(2),sprintf('\\times10^%d',e),...

for a real multiplication sign (as opposed to the letter 'x').

(I only spotted this because I have multiple subplots, some with the automatic scientific notation - and the multiplication sign - and one which I am forcing using your code.)

[Dinant Kistemaker]

one more very small change of:

text(xl(1),yl(2),sprintf('\\times10^%d',e),...

into:

text(xl(1),yl(2),sprintf('\\times10^{%d}',e),...

to correctly show the superscript

[Thomas Gillis]

The answer of phb worked for me, except that there is a small problem in the exponent computation.

It should be

e = floor(log10(abs(yl(2))));

instead of

e=log10(yl(2));
e=sign(e)*floor(abs(e));

Answer 1

[Carla Panarello]

The question is from many years ago, but maybe this answer can be useful for someone who has the same problem, since the solution is very easy (easier than the code proposed in a previous answer), but it was not easy at all to get it.

So, if you want to force the tick labels to be displayed in exponential notation with the order of magnitude appearing in the top left corner, you can use the following instructions (e.g. for the Y axis):

ax = gca;
ticklabel_exp_notation(ax.YAxis);

where the ticklabel_exp_notation() function can be defined as follows:

function ticklabel_exp_notation(axis)
    ord = floor(log10(max(abs(axis.Limits))));
    axis.Exponent = ord;
end

NOTE: If the axis limits change, the "order of magnitude" notation remains but the new best suitable order of magnitude is not calculated automatically. So it would be better to apply it at the end, when the figure is complete.

NOTE 2: If left and right axis are present, the function must be applied separately for each axis, e.g. as follows:

ax = gca;
ticklabel_exp_notation(ax.YAxis(1));
ticklabel_exp_notation(ax.YAxis(2));

Answer 2

[Steven Lord]

Take a look at the new axis customization functionality introduced in release R2015b and described in this post on Loren's blog. You may find some of the techniques described in that post useful.

Answer 3

[David Sanchez]

It doesn't appear to be possible:

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13326894/force-exponential-format-of-ticks-like-matlab-does-it-automatically

[pfb]

Hi David,

thanks a lot for your prompt reply. I missed the stack overflow very neatly posed question, but stumbled upon the one in matlab answers it points to. Ccook's "no-go" reply was conditioned to setting YTickLabel ("If you set YTickLabel, then there is no (documented) way to get MATLAB to automatically put in the exponent the same way.") I think that's pretty obvious... How can matlab know about the order of magnitude if you set the tick labels, which are strings? Perhaps he meant "YTick". By the way that's what prompted me to ask about "possibly undocumented" ways to do that.

It's a bit frustrating that there is no toggle for this behavior. After all, somewhere in the code for the figure there must be some check on the order of magnitude for the plot range. It seems to me that changing the default threshold for that check would do the trick.

I am not even able to get a handle for the text giving the order of magnitude, so it must be something in the axes structure (as opposed to a simple bit of text).

A couple of comments

1) my statement of the problem is not very precise. Of course the order of magnitude behavior does not apply only to "very small" plot ranges, but also to "very large" ones. It seems to me that the lower and upper bounds are 1e-3 and 1e+4.

2) I have checked that changing the ylim (which sets YLimMode to "manual") does not remove the scientific notation, provided that the new range is compatible with the above thresholds.

Answer 4

[Iain]

Here's a really simple option.

Change the units of the axes. Plot time, in, for example, hs, cs, ds, Ds, ms, ks ...

[pfb]

Hi Iain,

thanks for your contribution. However, this is not what I would like to get.

As I say, I like the order of magnitude thing. It is standard, compact, homogeneous (two plots with different orders of magnitude would "look" the same, except for the exponent).

Your method requires specifying the units... This can be done in the figure caption or perhaps in the axes labels. Either way, it is less compact, and I really have tight spatial constraints.

[Iain]

You do realise that people will ask "So what are the units?" if you don't put them on the labels...

[pfb]

Hi lain,

I noticed your comment just now. Sorry for the late reply. I'm replying anyway because your comment seems unnecessarily contentious.

Have you read my comment? Let me quote myself

"Your method requires specifying the units... This can be done in the figure caption or perhaps in the axes labels"

If someone asked "So what are the units?" I could reply "Pay attention! Look at the axes label and the figure caption"