Azzera filtri
Azzera filtri

"Input parser" vs. new "arguments" definition

25 visualizzazioni (ultimi 30 giorni)
Stefan Sp.
Stefan Sp. il 17 Gen 2022
Modificato: Stephen23 il 26 Giu 2023
R2019b introduced the new "arguments" section for function argument checking and parsing.
I hahe written some functions using the "old" input parser class. Are there any advantages to switch to the new syntax?
Is it worth to update my functions to the new syntax? (sure, I know, "never change a running system")
regards, Stefan
  1 Commento
chicken vector
chicken vector il 7 Apr 2023
Hi Stefan, this is a question of great interest.
Have you figured out an answer yet? I am implementing a library and I can't choose what to use.

Accedi per commentare.

Risposte (1)

埃博拉酱
埃博拉酱 il 7 Apr 2023
Modificato: 埃博拉酱 il 7 Apr 2023
The biggest advantage of the arguments block is readability, but it is far less flexible than varargin. People who are not familiar with your code can quickly understand your parameter requirements through the arguments block.
Another potential advantage may be ease of compiler optimization. Overly flexible varargin is difficult to optimize for performance.
  4 Commenti
Simon
Simon il 26 Giu 2023
I have the same question. Both inputParser and arguments are unfamiliar to me.
Stephen23
Stephen23 il 26 Giu 2023
Modificato: Stephen23 il 26 Giu 2023
@chicken vector: you can always use a comma-separated list, which works on every MATLAB version**:
options = {"parameters1", 1, "parameter2", 'foo', "parameter3", true}
myfunction(requiredInput, options{:})
** with cell arrays. AFAIK comma-separated lists were introduced at the same time.

Accedi per commentare.

Categorie

Scopri di più su Argument Definitions in Help Center e File Exchange

Prodotti


Release

R2019b

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by