Truncated SVD returns unexpected 1*1 result

3 views (last 30 days)
I am currently prefoming SVD on six channels varying in time of the same type of biometric data. The recorded channels are similar as therefore they feature high correlation.
I want to take these six channels and reduce them to a single channel using SVD, I take my data, rescale it and then preform the svd, so far so good. Where I run into problems is the reconstruction. If I want the orignal data X = U*S*V '.Instead I am trying to preform a truncation by only taking the first PC as this accounts for over 95% of the information anyways.
Instead of PC1 returning a vector (1 channel * given number of samples) I am returned a single value (1*1). I am assuming I have a matrix the wrong way around but I can't see how I am getting this result (Though I know that I am the likely problem). I will attach some open source data too.
data = rescale(data(1:6,:),0,1); % Rescale the data for reobustness between patients
[U,S,V] = svd(data(:,:),'econ'); % Preform SVD
PC1 = V(:,1)'*data(1,:)'; % Atempt to eqivilent single channel
I also know I can compute something similar with the code below, but I would just really like to know where I am going wrong now!
[coeff,score,latent] = pca(data');
new_matrix_for_classification = score(:,1);
Thank you,

Accepted Answer

Matt J
Matt J on 28 Jan 2022
Edited: Matt J on 28 Jan 2022
Well, you're multiplying a row vector by a column vector, so a scalar is the only result that is possible.
Shouldn't a 1-component reconstruction be,
Christopher McCausland
Christopher McCausland on 30 Jan 2022
Hi Matt,
Thank you so much! I had forgotten to remove the additional transpose in my third line. So I was transposing the data back to its orignal orientation. This is now working as I would expect, thank you!!
One additional thing that cropped up is a large negitive DC offset was added to the waveform, I can remove this with DSP techniques (which is what I am much more comfortable with), however I was wondering if you had any idea for what would cause such a shift post svd processing? (Probably) more out of intrest than usefulness.
Thank you again for all your help!

Sign in to comment.

More Answers (0)





Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by