How can I implement the following blocks and code in function block ?
Mostra commenti meno recenti
I would use the following integral equation as function block in my simulation. I know I can do it as what I attached but I need a way to implement it by code inside function block.

Risposte (1)
Mehmed Saad
il 8 Apr 2020
Modificato: Mehmed Saad
il 8 Apr 2020
This is an example of matlab given in integral help
% Without For loop
fun = @(x,c) 1./(x.^3-2*x-c);
q_f = integral(@(x)fun(x,5),0,2);
q_f = -0.4605
Now i just change the time of integration and sum them
% With For loop
t = 0:0.1:2;
q =0;
for i =2:length(t)
q =q+ integral(@(x)fun(x,5),t(i-1),t(i));
end
q = -0.4605
6 Commenti
Willim
il 9 Apr 2020
Mehmed Saad
il 9 Apr 2020
Modificato: Mehmed Saad
il 9 Apr 2020
Yes, so what you have to do is divide the integral interval in small intervals
suppose your time starts from 0 and ends at 10s with 1s second step (so there will ber 11 steps of time)
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Iteration 1:
y=integral(your_function,0,1);
Iteration 2:
y = integral(your_function,1,2);
Iteration 3:
y = integral(your_function,2,3);
.
.
.
Iteration 10:
y = integral(your_function,9,10);
So you have 10 different outputs
Similarly you can do it for 3000 time steps, what you need is current time step and previous time step (feedback).
I am not much familiar with simulink, if it doesnot work, try setting the xmin =0 for every iteration
(integral(fun,xmin,xmax))
Willim
il 9 Apr 2020
Walter Roberson
il 9 Apr 2020
Is this for continuous or discrete work?
What is the expected output for these three cases:
- current time is "close enough" to the end of one of the defined intervals
- previous time and current time are both in the middle of one of the defined intervals
- previous time was in the previous defined interval compared to the current time
Willim
il 10 Apr 2020
Walter Roberson
il 10 Apr 2020
With variable-step solvers, the block will be called at irregular intervals that might not match the interval that you want solutions at. The variable-step solvers can also go backwards in time (I encountered a case in which this really happened within the last few days.) ode45() invokes the function 6 times per step, using slightly different times and slightly different boundary conditions in order to make projections and check the error measurement.
In order to get results for a fixed time interval, because the function could be called for times spanning multiple intervals, you would have to emit a variable number of results -- and you would have to be prepared to have the values "revoked" if ode45 decided that the step was a failure. ode45 does not always go backwards in time when it decides that a step is a failure.
What is the reason that you are trying to replace those blocks with a MATLAB Function Block ? Are you trying to move to a discrete time system, using MATLAB Function Block to replace the ode45() work over a known interval?
Categorie
Scopri di più su Programmatic Model Editing in Centro assistenza e File Exchange
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!