Find different possible combinations of the rows of two matrices.

11 visualizzazioni (ultimi 30 giorni)
Consider two matrices:
a = [1 2 3; 4 5 6; 7 8 10]
a =
1 2 3
4 5 6
7 8 10
and b=a + 10
b =
11 12 13
14 15 16
17 18 20
first, I am trying to obtain all possible combination of rows (1st row of 'a' and all rows of 'b', second row of 'a' and all rows of 'b' and so on) such that the output is
c =
1 2 3 11 12 13
4 5 6 11 12 13
7 8 10 11 12 13
1 2 3 14 15 16
4 5 6 14 15 16
7 8 10 14 15 16
1 2 3 17 18 20
4 5 6 17 18 20
7 8 10 17 18 20
secondly for each row, I am storing the first 3 and the last 3 columns in a single index of a 3 index vector. So in this example the vector of combosets is 2x3x9 where element is
combosets(:,:,1) =
1 2 3
11 12 13
combosets(:,:,2) =
4 5 6
11 12 13
and so on. The code I am using is below. Is there any better and faster way to do this and prefarably step 1 and 2 combined?
Thanks in advance!
clc
clearvars;
a = [1 2 3; 4 5 6; 7 8 10]; % 3 by 3 matrix
b=a + 10; % 3 by 3 matrix
r=size(a,1);
combosets=zeros(r-1,r,r*r);
d={NaN};
% Step 1: storing different combination of rows in cell
for k=1:1:r
c=vertcat(horzcat(a(:,:),repmat(b(k,:),r,1)),horzcat(a(:,:),repmat(b(k,:),r,1)),horzcat(a(:,:),repmat(b(k,:),r,1)));
d{k}=(unique(c,'rows'));
end
ddash=cell2mat(d'); % making it a matrix again
% Step 2: storing in a multidimensional array
for j=1:1:r*r
rowset1=ddash(j,1:3);
rowset2=ddash(j,4:6);
combosets(:,:,j)=[rowset1;rowset2];
end

Risposta accettata

Johannes Fischer
Johannes Fischer il 8 Set 2020
a = [1 2 3; 4 5 6; 7 8 10]; % 3 by 3 matrix
b=a + 10; % 3 by 3 matrix
r=size(a, 1);
% create repetitions of values
a = repmat(a, [r, 1]);
b = repelem(b, r, 1);
% create combination matrix
c = [a b];
% reshape into combosets
combosets = reshape(c', 3, 2, 9);
% permute to get dimensions right
combosets = permute(combosets, [2, 1, 3]);
  1 Commento
Tuhin Choudhury
Tuhin Choudhury il 8 Set 2020
Modificato: Tuhin Choudhury il 8 Set 2020
Thank you! works perfectly fine. Infact your method works fastest and so I accepted this answer . although all of them work perfectly fine

Accedi per commentare.

Più risposte (1)

Adam Danz
Adam Danz il 8 Set 2020
Modificato: Adam Danz il 8 Set 2020
Fast & clean 2-liner:
a = [1 2 3; 4 5 6; 7 8 10];
b = a + 10;
c = [repmat(a,size(b,1),1), repelem(b, size(a,1),1)];
combosets = permute(reshape(c.',3,2,9),[2,1,3]);
  5 Commenti
Tuhin Choudhury
Tuhin Choudhury il 8 Set 2020
Modificato: Tuhin Choudhury il 8 Set 2020
I completely agree both are identical and I wish I could accept more than 1 answer. True that the readability helps as well. However for the speed, my problem lies with the vector size instead of reps, so initially i tested with 'a' as rand(1050x3) and the results were like:
>> Tuhin
Elapsed time is 2.835849 seconds.
>> Stephen
Elapsed time is 0.124517 seconds.
>> Johannes
Elapsed time is 0.085730 seconds.
>> Adam
Elapsed time is 0.094663 seconds.
Then I realized that in this case the speed might depend on the values generated by rand. So I tested with a fixed matrix 'a' (size (7,3)).The resutls were:
>> Tuhin
Elapsed time is 0.031925 seconds.
>> Stephen
Elapsed time is 0.007881 seconds.
>> Johannes
Elapsed time is 0.002299 seconds.
>> Adam
Elapsed time is 0.002421 seconds.
Like I said, both of you have very identical speed (way faster than mine :) )
Thanks again for the answer!
Adam Danz
Adam Danz il 8 Set 2020
"I wish I could accept more than 1 answer"
You accepted the right one if it works for your data and it make sense to you. The time difference is so small that readability and understandability are important factors. Plus, I like when newer contributors get recognition for their contributions and encouragement to continue doing so 🙂.

Accedi per commentare.

Categorie

Scopri di più su Particle & Nuclear Physics in Help Center e File Exchange

Prodotti


Release

R2019a

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by